REVELATIONS – THE CRIME OF OUR LIVES

 

(Taxpayers have the right to know)

Should the Taxpayers’ funds have been used to pay for the bankers errors – when it was the Taxpayers’ own funds deposited for safety in the banks that were used by the bankers to make that error (of loss) in the first place?

THE LECTURE

The cause and the effects of the (forthcoming) recession were known in 2002, in fact, the subject was taught to professional students on CPD on the 2001-2002 academic course year of the EDEXCEL BTEC HNC in Building Studies.

At the time, the economy was positively booming – and that was the problem.

As explained in the lectures given by (Ecotect) Anthony Smith MA, Architect and Lecturer at The College of West Anglia, there was something seriously wrong with the architectural design for an economical system that went from positively blooming to bust overnight, (repeatedly).

The property bubble inflated by the bankers and the stock market would be burst – for the (very) last time – by the second wave of the recession.

At the time, bankers were lending money hand-over-fist as if there was no tomorrow – as if they had all the money in the world at their disposal to do so, (but when, in reality, the only money the bankers really had, was all the money deposited and saved by the Taxpayers).

Using the UK in example first, Tony Smith prophesised that the government would, (in all probability), use everything at their disposal to bail out the bankers, (however, looking at the figures, it clearly should not).

The level of debt only started in the UK at around the time of the First World War – but it grew dramatically in the 1980s leading into the last recession of the early 1990s – and little had been repaid since.

Since the mountain of debt stood (still) since the last recession, the level of debt created by the bankers in the new recession would just add to it.

Worse still, looking at the figures, if the UK government used the Taxpayers’ (own) funds to bail out the bankers, it would leave the UK government with an insufficient funding dilemma – because there simply wouldn’t be enough money left in the bank to cover the cost of running the country or the welfare state.

There were already (far) too many people living in poverty in Britain anyway at the time – the gap between rich and poor was widening exponentially – and sweeping the figures of excluded groups under the rug in Westminster only hid the (very) real problem the UK had in terms of breaches in Human Rights Law.

Since the end of WWII, the UK government (and most other nations) had accepted the terms of the Geneva Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Bill of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, and adopted Agenda 21, they would stand in breach of the human rights provided to citizens – as these rights could not be protected – if the Taxpayers’ funds were used to bail out the bankers.

Everyone has the right to Justice – but not everyone has the right to Justice – in fact, people now just have ICE instead, (the Independent Case Examiners, ICE).

Everyone has the right to free medical healthcare (including dentistry) – but not everyone who needs it actually has access to either.

The list was endless – in fact, (silently), the UK government has removed Human Rights – even before the second wave of recession hits.

The lectures gave insight into a very disturbing future – for everyone.

The questions remained – why should the UK (or any other) government, simply continue to bail out the bankers (when the bankers themselves were professionally responsible for their own architectural design economically) – why weren’t the bankers themselves held accountable?

Knowing the future – knowing full well that recession was imminent (from the 2002 lectures) – shouldn’t the bankers themselves also have been aware of their own accounting errors, (of the trouble they would bring to the world if they continued to over-sell debt)?

Certainly, in terms of the law, it is against the law to provide false advice – for example, knowing that recession is imminent, ALL the banks’ staff (and all other financial advisers), broke the law from 2002 onwards – because instead of advising Taxpayers to take on (more) debts to buy (even) more property, they should have been advised NOT to, because recession was imminent.

(But then, perhaps the bankers had an alternative ‘game’ plan.)

In any event, by the time that the government had used all the nation’s assets to bail out the bankers, central government would be forced to make cuts.

The cuts were predicted to effect the poorest people in the country, people without rights, (people living in exclusion), first and foremost, (because it was predicted that – due to continued prejudice – central government’s axe would chop the rate at which benefits were paid).

Wages (and low-income top-ups) weren’t being kept in line with inflation.

Booming property (and land) values were preventing far too many people from buying their own homes, and, (due to the fact that there was a serious shortfall in available affordable housing), far too many people were forced to rent housing.

As the cost of renting property continued to rise in line with the costs of the landlords’ buy-to-let mortgage repayments, far too many people needed to claim housing benefits, (from their Local Government departments).

The poor rental tenants forced to live in ‘unaffordable’ (and often unsocial) housing, would be made poorer by central and local government cuts, and while people in excluded groups were usually relied on charities and non-profit organisations, central government cuts to grants paid to the non-profit sector were also expected to reduce the level of support people living in the UK.

Cuts were also expected to cut even further back on the NHS, free Education (to the level of grants provided), Libraries, Emergency Services, (including the Fire Brigade and police services), and (free) Legal Aid, (already cut to many in the recession of the early 1990s, at the inception of the CSA.

People’s rights – protected by law since UK law adopted Human Rights Laws – would be breached by central government’s cuts, (as just one of the effects of the recession), and as prejudice against people forced to endure poverty continued at the highest levels, central government’s cuts to balance the national debts would create huge increase to levels of poverty and child poverty.

Unemployment levels would rise, (especially in rural areas), and in parallel line with rising sea levels.

It was predicted that the bankers would go on to do continue with their ‘business as usual’ – with continuing to sell debt as a prime commodity – which would soon lead the world into the second save of recession.

Besides which, it would not be possible to simply build back out of the predicted recession as with all previous recessions anyway – because there simply weren’t enough global resources left. (Students on the EDEXCEL BTEC HNC in Building Studies were also taught of the need for their work to achieve the highest possible standards and to aim for the highest possible achievable targets for sustainable construction, to be built to code Level 6+ GREEN Build targets).

THE SOLUTION:

In terms of rebalancing the national economy – and the natural ecology – and to reduce poverty, (without reduction in human rights), there were ecological architectural designs already proven autonomous and viable, (to build code Level 6+), which particularly helped the environment (all round), and which set (important) planning precedent.

So-called ‘affordable’ housing – even provided by Housing Associations and Housing Trusts – wasn’t, (at least not without Housing Benefits paid, or axed), and Tony Smith foresaw a self-build D.I.Y. (truly affordable and sustainable) eco-build revolution.

People don’t all want to rent (unaffordable) housing or claim housing benefits – they do so because there is often no other alternative.

There is no truly ‘affordable’ housing – but there easily could be – to build code Level 6+.

One of the examples of sustainable design referred to in the lecture room at the time was that of CAT Eco-Village, (the Centre for Alternative Technology), Canolfan y Dechnoleg Amgen in Wales.

Students were advised to further research the CAT website on www.cat.org.uk and to use this, as the basis for further research, and for inspiration for their own designs to achieve the highest possible and achievable design and build standards, to build code Level 6+ (**I.E. GREEN DESIGN).

The biggest problem – in terms of truly affordable and sustainable housing solutions – was ‘The Land’, (or rather, the lack of availability of ‘The Land’).

The second any land (anywhere) was considered potential development land – the cost to buy shot through the roof – preventing any (truly) affordable homes.

Land for building was at premium rate – with house prices still held up by the banking bailout – and with profits on property development and redevelopment still expected to fill the banks to repay the deficit of the bankers own loans.

ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES:

To achieve the highest possible design and build practices, designers needed to consider not only the construction of the building itself and the level of energy embedded in the construction materials specified, but the environment, local needs, and the practical use of alternative technologies.

In example, water would become ‘the new oil’, and designers needed to specify alternatives to the aerobic Victorian toilet systems invariably installed.

This was especially pertinent in areas of known and predicted flood risk zones.

Vented sewage systems allowed flood water to access the system, flushing raw sewage into flood waters, polluting local homes, offices, shops, restaurants, and all in it’s wake.

The specification of ecological toilet systems with anaerobic digesters could easily negate the problems in flood risk areas, and with biogas plant equipment also installed, could easily also provide families and communities with free electricity as well as with biogas for cooking and heating.

Designers needed to research to find as many alternative technologies as possible, offering truly sustainable design solutions, harnessing the power of the sun, wind, waves, (tidal currents), geothermal heat sources, reverse refrigeration, and kinetic energy.

However, there was a problem, (primarily caused because the banks had invested so much money in the oil cartels and the fossil fuel industry, fracking, nuclear power, nuclear arms, and included the car manufacturing industries).

THE BANKERS’ ROTTEN CORE:

Although it wasn’t quoted in the 2002 lectures, the previous year, a huge amount of research on the bankers’ Central Bank, (the Bank for International Settlements, the BIS, or “the BIZ”), was collated in readiness for the GREEN Party’s economics group mini-conference (held in Manchester), as shown listed on the Bilderberg.org (not-for-profit) website.

As quoted on the Bilderberg website on http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm – the BIS “… controls most of the transferrable money in the world. It uses that money to draw national governments into debt for the IMF”. (The BIS laundered money looted by the Nazis in WWII, in fact, Adolf Hitler himself previously helmed the BIS.)

So, in effect, it was not a banking error, so much as a banking aim.

In effect, by long term futures (market) planning of the rotten (Nazi) core central to the banks own integral aims, even though the Nazis themselves lost WWII, they went on to win the world anyway economically, (or at least they will, if people aren’t made aware of this information and remove the power the bankers have over the world today).

Realistically, someone, (somewhere), should have stopped the global debt clock from ticking (like the time bomb it is today).

In 2002, the total combined global governmental figure of debt stood in the region of US$22Trillions – almost tripled, today fast approaching US$60Trillions – rising incrementally at the rate of circa US$100,000 per second, (still), according to the global debt clock of The Economist online.

No matter what anyone ‘at the top’ may say that recession is over – it isn’t.

IF the governments used the Taxpayers’ funds and all other national assets at their disposal to bail out the bankers, when the second wave of recession hit, it would leave governments all over the world in crisis – and the bankers holding all the Title Deeds to all the land and property in the world, (to everything and everyone).

CONCLUSION:

The Nazis, (and Narcissists), never had any compassion nor conscience.

Title Deeds to land and property, (as owned freehold by the Taxpayers), invariably have clauses written (in very small print), stating that in certain instances, such as default on repayments, or war, the banks (or the government) could repossess the property.

It was predicted that when the second wave of recession hit, it could well lead to WWIII, (as one of the ways in which national assets could be increased, is to invade other nations and seize theirs, killing all who stood in their way).

The second wave of recession would either allow the bankers to win the world ‘game’ of Monopoly, or it would (finally) free the people from their enslavement.

Either way, the second wave of recession would leave all governments in crisis, with no funds left to bail out the bankers again, or to protect their citizens from the worst effects of climate change.

If the world had learned anything from WWII, then it would not lead into WWIII, but instead, it would lead into the protection of the Human Rights provided for the people since WWIII.

Alternative, inclusive, sustainable and ethical design solutions, following the guidelines written for world peace and for the protection of humanity, (including the Geneva Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Bill of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, Agenda 21, and Constitutional Law), were vital.

The bankers should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies – which companies survive recessions, (and which don’t) – the bankers are not God, (nor even at their central core, Good).

There is neither equality nor Human Rights, (these are just words printed on rectangular pieces of paper), and all the Taxpayers in the world have the right to know, (this situation could easily have been avoided, alternative solutions were already proven viable globally, and not-for-profit).

The scales of justice are currently hanging upside down, waving in the breeze, (apparently Lady Justice just left the building).

IF (true) Justice is divine, then now it is truly ‘REVELATIONS’ time!

Unblock – Legal Aid Protest 2013 – Norwich

Legal Aid Protest Norwich 2013 JPEG.001

My daughter (Izzy) and I went to protest against the Conservative Government cuts to Legal Aid, at an Unblock protest organised in Norwich early in October 2013, and where I was interviewed by Roger Blackwell representing the News Line newspaper, at which in interview, as I stated at the time:

“I’m here because I don’t get any legal aid.”

“My children and I were unfortunately mis-sold faulty vehicle for the launch of our social enterprise.”

“We ended up taking the first stage of our journey, which was going to be an expedition and exhibition tour promoting the Eco-Village Network UK, Permaculture, Open Source Ecology, and other non-profit making organisations.”  (N.B.  See below.)

“We ended up in a field near Wells-Next-The-Sea for eight months with no legal aid, no protection against freezing sub-zero temperatures without any form of heating with no mains electricity or no access to a bath or laundry.”

“We’d been waiting for UK Trading Standards to take some form of action on our part which they didn’t.”

“In December they said we’d got enough evidence to take them to court but you don’t get any legal aid.”

“The suppliers had taken our money for a vehicle which was faulty.  We couldn’t launch our social enterprises as we had intended.  We have no protection against them.  We have no justice unless we can get free pro bono help from a Barrister or trainee Barrister.”

“These cuts were predicted by The College we attended who (in 2002) said after the recession there would be a housing crisis, there would be child poverty and cutbacks in public services like the NHS, there would be a housing crisis, there would be more people homeless and everything which we see today.”

I have just edited the original photograph used in the News Line report, Roger Blackwell mis-quoted the Eco-Village Network UK, so I added text and relevant links to the original PDF page, (plus, the large N looked a bit rude next to the word cuts, and hence I stuck a Swastika graphic over it – and N does stand for the words ‘Nazis’ and ‘Narcissists’ after all, as, according to at least one report written by Kitty Jones (shared via Diggers350), the Tories are following the Nazi tradition, i.e. Loss of Human Rights, Consumer Rights and Civil Rights, “incentivising behaviour change” to ensure that poor people who don’t have any money to live on are punished out of their poverty.

Punishing the poor for being poor – even when they are only made poor by the same Government that made them all poor in the first place – by their own greed.  (I.E.  Conservatives in North Norfolk want a 23% pay rise in 2016, at the Taxpayers expense.)

N.B.  Talking of which, I have been prevented from earning my income as anticipated for four-and-a-half years now, due to the crime/s against us, (detailed in the above report and An ARK Angel Account, as linked below) – and, as a poor person (with poor children at the time too), was punished for the crime of poverty as the victims of the crime in the first place – because the UK Government removed ALL access free legal aid, blocking the roads to Justice!

Please also refer to:

An ARK Angel Account

State-regulated cryptocurrency and micro-managing people claiming welfare

The Bank for International Settlements

The Eco-Village Network UK (EVNUK)

(Will add to this report later.)

BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling — BCfm Politics Show

Friday 15th July 2016 BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling At five – discussing the big stories in Bristol, Britain and around the world After six – straight talking and investigative reports with Martin Summers Listen live http://www.bcfmradio.com/player or http://stream.bcfmradio.com:7017/live.mp3 BCfm audio files usually available 2 hours after TX Any probs mp3s should be on alternative links below by then First […]

via BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling — BCfm Politics Show

Breaking Silence

IMG_0500 IMG_0498

I’ve just spent the past seven months writing 2000 (odd) pages of draft copy, trying to write to our local constituency MP Keith Simpson MP (Conservative) – only to write eleven pages in two days to Norman Lamb MP (Liberal Democrat).

On behalf of my children’s lack of rights, (and rural poverty), I first opened a case file with Norman Lamb MP in 2008, and discussed why I had fallen (seriously) into debt trying to raise three children alone, living in (rural) North Norfolk, (as none of the benefits support rurally isolated self-employed single parents living in the UK, with irregular earnings, no child-maintenance, and no second wage), with Norman Lamb’s (then) senior Caseworker Alex Howe, (now retired).

Back in the last quartile of 2008, (or early in 2009), or I also had a long telephone conversation with Alex Howe regarding her work for the Friends of the Earth (FoE), for the preparation of the research and documentation that they needed to present to the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992 – issued (at least in part) forming Agenda 21 (as it was originally issued).

As Michelle Harrison-Drake (ARK’s Secretary) and I went on to meet with Norman Lamb MP later in 2009 to discuss proposals for floating Global ARK Projects (social enterprises), it was far (FAR) easier to write to Norman Lamb MP (again) now. (Much easier!) N.B. Norman passed our presentation folder (with letters of endorsement written by Avril Fox and key documents edited and mentored by Tony Smith MA, Architect and Lecturer at The College of West Anglia), on to Lord Hunt OBE, who in turn forwarded the file on to Dan Norris who was the Labour MP for DEFRA at the time – who stonewalled us, (twice).

We need legal representation – we have none – and because we don’t, (because the UK Government axed free Legal Aid), the criminals are getting away with their crimes against us, while we ourselves, (my children and I), were forced to live in sub-zero temperatures without any form of heating, without electricity, without any easy access to either a bath or laundry facilities – and, for one week, we were even forced to walk a two-mile-a-day round trip each day to collect drinking water (from Wells).

If my children and I were convicted criminals, we’d have had three hot meals a day, central heating, showers, clean clothes, access to the Internet, AND right to FREE legal representation – but as the victims of the criminals – we had NONE.

Added to which, as we were going to tour the UK and EU (and later Earth), as I had been commissioned to make the teaching resources for the (Pearson) EDEXCEL BTEC units in environmental sustainability in April 2011, (and to sell my research as was), and as my children, my husband, (and friends), were going to learn practically site-to-site as we travelled, as the vehicle purchased for the intended tour didn’t work, (and was fraudulently miss-sold to us from the start anyway), we couldn’t do what we’d intended – because Trading Standards (based at Norfolk County Council offices in Norwich) failed to take any action against the criminals on our behalf – even after they had spent nine months assessing that we had the case against the criminals that we claimed we had when I first registered the case with Trading Standards in March 2012.

That meant that after investing circa £40K of our own money in all the equipment needed for our intended tour – I was only able to earn just £700 (gross) from January 2012 (when the vehicle was fraudulently supplied faulty), to October 2013, (when I FINALLY got a car to drive again – albeit, yet again, that we were the victims of fraudsters).

Within a week or so of getting a car – through my friend Wayne Jolly (North Norfolk Roofing) – I got a part-time job delivering Good Luck out to the villages and hamlets around Briston, and have been doing so ever since, while also simultaneously working on the case for the prosecution against the fraudsters who broke the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 (all amendments and updates).

I’ve also been writing to the (Norfolk) Citizens Advice Bureau NCAB (who gave advice), the Norwich and Peterborough (Yorkshire) Building Society – who charged me for having insufficient funds, (the charges were taken by the building society out of my working tax and child tax credits – which I believe was also against the rules), and asking for FREE bank statements as needed for the court case/s, and for Green Party Councillor Adrian Dearnley (Thorpe Hamlet/Norwich), the Building Society said that I had to pay for them!

During the nine months my children and I were stuck on the field in North Norfolk – left there to die of frostbite by the lack of action of Trading Standards and the suppliers – I had meetings with friends, associates, and clients, including (retired solicitor) Howard Leftley (who drafted my preliminary statement, court claim and preliminary damage impact statement), and Neil Godfrey, Development Officer at Voluntary Norfolk (formerly NOAH), who volunteered to represent Global ARK Projects at a Green Party meeting in Norwich, where he met Green Party Councillor Adrian Dearnley – who very kindly volunteered to prepare audited accounts for the ARK, (hence also why I needed hard copy of the bank statements).

Basically, after paying out circa £40K on all the equipment needed for us to launch the ARK, (and after circa ten years unpaid work MINUS all the expenses), I was left with a debt of circa £70K and with an income of only £700 (gross) over twenty months – with three children to support – and, (contrary to Lord Freud MP’s 2012 statement), not “ALL self-employed single parents and sickness claimants live in comfort on a few hundred quid annual wages” – as proven by our one case alone. (Or at least it will be – IF – we actually have access to Justice, to Consumer Rights, Human Rights and Civil Rights, AND actually do have our day in court!)

It also left HMRC (Inland Revenue/Tax Credits) axing Child Tax Credits for Izzy in 2014 – which, (owing to the fact that we have NO Legal Aid), left me to be our own legal representative in our case of Appeal against HMRC, (in between writing the legal case for the prosecution, in all the draft copy to Keith Simpson MP) – and (thanks be to God), I won our right to Appeal and (finally) we were given back-payment of the arrears that were due to us from 2014-2015.

What the heck were we supposed to be living on – when I had £70K debt, had paid out ALL our money £40K, had only earned £700 (gross) in 20 months, and only had a part-time wage delivering Good Luck – and I still had full duty of care and full financial responsibility for Izzy and Stuart, when HMRC decided to axe Child Tax Credits for Izzy, (not that I got any for Stuart from the point at which he became sixteen anyway, so we were already living as three people on a top-up for two people) – and besides, there isn’t a top-up in the UK for people with irregular earnings, let alone a wage of MINUS £39K, (especially not when all the claim forms ask for is a £0 for a MINUS years trading figure).

The reason HMRC axed Child Tax Credits was because they said I hadn’t home-studied Izzy before her sixteenth birthday – their claim later changed to be ‘immediately before, and/or on her sixteenth birthday. (Although we did actually – it just wasn’t as we’d planned.)

As stated, the plan was for Izzy, Patrick, Stuart, (and my husband Gobi), to gain practical sustainable construction skills helping to build affordable eco-buildings, Eco-Village (type) carbon neutral sustainable community settlements, and Permaculture – while we travelled, and while I made the teaching resources for the EDEXCEL BTEC units in environmental sustainability, sustainable construction, sustainable communities, climate change, (etc.), basically, as we helped to build Eco-Villages, my children and my husband would be gaining practical course skills for accreditation on the EDEXCEL BTEC course, (which was to have been a practical skills course anyway).

Suffice to say perhaps, that my faith in Justice was restored (a bit), when Judge Cooper decided to allow my right to Appeal against HMRC, (on the basis that the application to Home-Study Izzy HAD been approved by Norfolk County Council Education Department) – as virtually ALL the departments expecting me to prove myself (repeatedly) have GOV.UK on the correspondence, I had started to feel that there really was no access to Justice at all – despite the fact that we fell into the category most identified as being significantly vulnerable by Agenda 21 as (rurally isolated) self-employed single mother, and a daughter ‘girl-child’, and (as Agenda 21 was adopted by the UK Government after issue at the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992 – and as I have to follow these guidelines myself as an architectural designer and technologist, and as a social entrepreneur, to follow the UK Government guidelines for social enterprise/s, my daughter, sons, husband and I have ALL been left completely unsupported by ALL the GOV.UK departments dealing with our case).

We have the evidence to prove this in a court of law:–

We have the evidence to prove that the defendants (RPi International Limited) DID fraudulently miss-sell faulty goods that were (seriously) ‘unfit for purpose’ – and have the evidence also to prove that the lack of action of Trading Standards left my children and I living in worse conditions than convicted criminals, (at serious risk of death by their negligence in fact), and that (as usual) North Norfolk District Council Benefits Department failed to prioritise our case as a (rurally isolated) self-employed single mother and daughter ‘girl-child’, that GOV.UK departments failed to follow, or to implement, Agenda 21, and that Her Majesty Revenues and Customs also similarly failed to take into account the level of poverty that my daughter, my son (and I) were forced to endure – that HMRC failed to take into account the fact that my children and I WERE (and still are) the victims of the fraudulent trading practices of rogue traders, that the lack of Benefits also led Broadland Housing Association to threaten us with eviction proceedings, (on more than one occasion), after we had been left virtually homeless and of no fixed abode as the result of the crime of RPi International Limited.

Plus, (perhaps obviously), I have evidence to prove Lord Freud MP wrong, to also prove Iain Duncan-Smith and George Osborne MPs wrong, (£53 per week is NOT the lowest sum that anyone is ever expected to live on in the UK in the 21st Century), and that the PM David Cameron is wrong too, (the PM was quoted by the media as having said on several occasions that ‘nobody could have anticipated the effects of recession’), but they did – we were taught about the cause and the effects of the recession in 2002, on the 2001-2002 academic course year of the EDEXCEL BTEC HNC in Building Studies. (Reference: Tony Smith MA, Architect and Lecturer at The College of West Anglia, Tennyson Avenue, King’s Lynn – who mentored our design proposals for Eco-Designs, for TAP the Tree Ark Project intentional showcase Eco-Village Norfolk, and for Global ARK Projects ‘GAP’ social enterprises.)

We knew that recession was imminent, in fact, Tony Smith said “ALL THE SIGNS” showed it was only a matter of time before the bankers would burst the booming economy – by their over-sell of debt.

As such, I also have evidence to prove the bankers error – that the world has been plunged into a sum of combined global governmental debt that it cannot get out of – and worse, STILL there is no ‘body’ controlling ALL the bankers, (other than the Bank of England in the UK – itself obviously having vested interests).

The total combined governmental (or National) sum of debt when recession was warned in 2002 was circa US$22Trillion – so it should have stopped there – bankers shouldn’t have advised their customers to take out 100%-125% mortgages (or loans) after that point, but they did, and by the year 2014, the total combined governmental figure of debt had over doubled to a sum in excess of US$54Trillion, (and it is STILL rising at the rate of circa US$100,000 per second).

The UK Government has already sold off the gold reserves and axed grants to the non-profit sector (as anticipated in 2002), it has already also axed grant funds to Norfolk County Council (as anticipated), and it has already axed public spending on vital services such as the NHS, the Library, Emergency Services, the Police, and departments such as Trading Standards, Legal Aid, and (of course) Benefits – all to try to balance the books after bailing out the bankers using HMRC Taxpayers funds.

Plus – as an architectural designer, technologist, as a community founder and as a social entrepreneur – the new ‘Gagging Law’ forbids me from making any criticism of the UK Government – should I just criticise the bankers instead?

Also – if we criticise the UK Government – does that mean that we get a free court case, (because we need access to one anyway)? So yes, I did have to write to local MPs, (but, finally, to Norman Lamb MP first).

God Knows – we need legal representation!

Plus – I also have evidence to prove that my husband and hundreds of his co-workers have been left unpaid 50% of their wages for up to eight years work, plus I have evidence to prove that their (UK/Middle Eastern) employers don’t show any overseas tax registration number on any of their documentation – AND that the UK based HR Director denied employing my husband, when I sought help in the UK for my husband after he was the victim of attempted murder by his machete wielding neighbour in 2008.

Plus, now this, on top of everything else, I also have evidence to prove that my daughter was the victim of actual bodily harm (ABH) by Orbit Housing Association neighbours.

My poor daughter has really had enough, so have my two sons – one of whom was unfairly dismissed when signed off sick by the Doctor at North Elmham Surgery…

I could go on – and on – and besides, don’t just have our own evidence, but also that of numerous friends and family too.

If Justice is to be done – if the laws are to be upheld – then ‘someone’ has to implement the laws and provide access to Justice, otherwise ‘The Law’ is just something that is to be held against all the good people who try to follow ‘The Law’ – while all those who are guilty of crimes are getting away with them.

(And besides, as ‘The Scales of Justice’ have been held by a female for thousands of years – is it not time that females themselves actually had access to the Justice they hold and represent themselves?)

Otherwise, what was the point?

N.B. Please note that the vision for what became Global ARK Projects ‘GAP’ was first seen in the lecture room in 2002, when the cause and the effects of the recession were first provided, and when the need for environmentally sustainable architecture was taught, for design and build to achieve the highest possible Trading Standards of build code Level 6 (+), designed to suit the predicted effects of climate change, (known not to be merely predictions, but facts). I.E. Earth’s climate changes regularly – and when it does, it happens rapidly – illustrated by Hunstanton Cliffs. As an environmentalist myself since I was a child in the 1960s, I have been campaigning successive Governments petitioning for change for decades as a FoE – hence was sitting in the right place at the right time to learn that it was now time for those changes I had been campaigning for to be implemented, and as such, if an ARK (type) Eco-Village (type) sustainable community can (or could) be designed and built in a bubble, then it will meet the guidelines set by the United Nations, by Nations, and by Local Authorities representing both Nations and United Nations Planning Laws, and Planning Guidelines for Communities. ARKs aim was simply to fast-track sustainability for the sake of the children and all future generations – knowing that there wouldn’t be sufficient funding. Hence the aim was to save the UK Government/HMRC Taxpayers £Billions and Local Authorities/Councils £Millions – by helping people to build their own affordable Eco-Homes and their own Eco-Village (type) communities – and to earn our income (in part) as a percentage of the savings provided by our services. (Whether working as ‘Eco-Designs’, TAP the Tree Ark Project intentional showcase Eco-Village community, or GAP, Global ARK Projects – or as the Eco-Village Network UK, EVNUK.)

N.B. Social Enterprises often find it almost impossible to gain access to grant funds before they launch – and architects, architectural designers, technologists and other designers working on research, feasibility studies, and design proposals for communities, are often forced to work for £0.00 (minus expenses), on all the work before Planning Approvals are granted, (at which point grants are, or were, available) – however, it is virtually impossible to gain planning consents without having access to any land in the first place, (or a replacement site), resulting (in our own case) with proposals prepared (at least to some stage) for several different sites – as explained in a meeting with Senior Planning Strategy Manager at North Norfolk District Council, Mark Ashwell, in November 2014. (MPs who complain that they can’t manage on £68K per annum plus expenses, need to consider how much worse off families are, when their parent is expected to work for £0 minus expenses by the GOV.UK.)

As soon as the email to Norman Lamb MP has been edited and I manage to edit the summary of evidence – when I have emailed this through to Norman Lamb MP, I will be forwarding it on to:

  • Adrian Dearnley, Green Party Councillor (Thorpe Hamlet/Norwich)
  • Keith Simpson MP (Conservative – Local Constituency)
  • Neil Godfrey, Development Officer, Voluntary Norfolk (formerly NOAH)Tony Gosling,
  • Investigative Journalist, (Helm at Eco-Village Network UK, EVNUK)
  • Tony Smith MA, Architect & Lecturer at The College of West Anglia, King’s Lynn
  • And others, including family, friends, Quakers, and the HMRC/GOV.UK Appeal and Tribunals Court (as promised), plus I will also be forwarding out the meeting notes from my meeting with Mark Ashwell, (Senior Planning Strategy Manager at North Norfolk District Council, as held in Cromer offices in November 2014), my previous email to Keith Simpson MP, (December 2014), and my meeting notes from my meeting with Green Party Councillor Adrian Dearnley at Norfolk County Council offices in Norwich, from November 2013.

Please also note that GAP and TAP were co-designed with veteran environmentalists and co-founding officers, including expert in environmentally sustainable architecture and published author, Avril Fox – whom I represent. Avril Fox is author of: Common Malaysian Moths (Copyright Longman Group UK Limited), The Emerging Ethic, and I.E. GREEN DESIGN – first published in 1989 by Architecture Design and Technology Press London, 1989 © Copyright Longman Group UK Limited, ISBN: 1 85454 200 1. I.E. GREEN DESIGN is an essential A-Z ‘guide to the environmental impact of construction materials’, (a standard reference book for Architects, Architectural Designers, Technologists, Students, and the public, listing different construction materials often specified in construction, and their damages upon the environment, and humanity, when used). In 2011, Avril Fox gave me her autobiography ‘The Long Road To Realism’ to proof read and get published – in order to raise the float funds for building Global ARK Projects, and to cover the costs, (currently covered by my children and I), to help to build Eco-Village (type) community settlements, (etc.), and hence also another reason why we chose to purchase a restored/recycled LWB Land Rover Defender 110, with a “brand new” 100% gas fuelled V8 4.6 litre engine to tow our 3 ton payload across the UK and EU – at least until we got out and were visible for funding to finish off the 11 ton exhibition lorry. N.B. When I finally got the use of a car again, I went to meet Avril Fox (my hero) two days after my meeting with Adrian Dearnley in November 2013, and walked away with another two books to get to the publishers, as well as Avril’s hand-written edited version of ‘The Emerging Ethic’ – not knowing at the time that I would need to battle with the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society, Appeal against HMRC Inland Revenue/Tax Credits, writing the full report ‘(Rural) Business Diversification Plan and Insufficient Funding Dilemma’ (for all departments and applications and in evidence for the Court hearings), and, I must admit, I find it incredibly difficult to write about myself and our family’s tragedy, and the dire consequences for my daughter Izzy – especially as, (as diagnosed by my children and friends who saw me), I had at least two nervous breakdowns without any rights, while living in sub-zero temperatures – with teeth clamped together to prevent chattering, without heat, without electricity, without easy access to a bath or laundry – forced to watch my daughter wash her hair in freezing conditions under a stand-pipe with freezing cold water, and no way to warm up or to dry her hair. (NOBODY should EVER be forced to endure all that my daughter was – especially not in the 21st Century – and NOT after Agenda 21 was issued in 1992 and adopted by the UK Government – but not actually implemented to protect the rights of the ‘girl-child’ or the rurally isolated self-employed single mother.)

If our case helps anyone else – then it is as it should be. (We just pray that Norman Lamb MP can, and will, help – or that ‘someone’ else, ‘somewhere’ can if he cannot.)

We need our money back – AND we need all the damages to which we are entitled by law – for ALL the damages caused to us, and to everyone else we represent, by ALL those that caused the damages to us. (And that is something that I cannot legally do myself as our own legal representative – because no Judge could accept my being the victim, the victim’s legal representative AND the damages assessor for this case, or for any other. There is a limit – and I have reached it – thankfully, I have written my socks off to one and all, while in the silence I am now breaking, once at least – and for all!)

“TRIDENT”: (The Arms Race – OR – The Human Race)?

In Norfolk, our local Football Team (in Carrow Road) is known as ‘The Canaries’.

In day’s gone by, miners used to take Canaries down into the pits with them in cages.  If a Canary stopped singing and dropped from it’s perch dead onto the bottom of its cage – the miners all knew they had to keep checking the second and third canaries to see if it was time for them all to get out of the mine, (fast).

Right now, 10% of all species are falling off their perches and dropping dead on the bottom of their cages – and by the end of this 21st Century, 33% of all species are expected to fall off their perches onto the bottom of their ‘cage’.

If this isn’t a huge (global) indication that there’s already something very wrong with the working conditions in our own ‘pit’ – then what is?

(And even worse – where can all the innocent little children run to tomorrow when all the canaries have died – because this is ‘top-side’, not ‘down in the pits’?)

We cannot leave this vast ‘emporium’ of a ‘coal mine’ – there’s nowhere else to run, and hence what affects one, affects us all ‘here in this space and place’.

The effects of nuclear radiation take thousands of years to clear – which means that ALL the leaking nuclear reactors, all the spent nuclear ‘waste’ already dumped into the oceans, ALL the nuclear bombs, (AND all the nuclear tests), have ALL added up to increase levels of nuclear radiation in our places of work and habitation.

When added to ALL the other pollutants that have also been added to all the water, the air, the soil, (and our food), this has already increased our chances of getting some form of cancer from 1:10 to 6:10 over the last forty years.

Everyone – every baby born, every child, every woman – and every man, has a ‘Right To Life’ protected by ‘Law’.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind you (ALL) in Westminster – of your duties to ‘us’ (ALL) – out here in ALL the land that surrounds you on all sides, (everywhere), that you are ALL supposed to be protecting our best interests – and not just your own, (and the bankers).

The financial investments placed in the new nuclear Trident war missiles – are supposed to be coming from – where?

Where on Earth do you all think that there is money for new nuclear –when there isn’t even enough money to be able to provide even the basic levels of public services to support the community today in the UK in the first place?

The UK has just been forced to borrow yet another £50Billion from China – just in order to try to get out of the mess that all the bankers created yesterday.

(According to Quaker publications read in 2013), circa £10Billion funds have been allocated for new Trident nuclear missiles.

How?

(And perhaps more to the point – why?)

What on Earth are you all trying to do to us (ALL)?

(And besides – there isn’t enough money left in the bank now is there!?)

The combined global governmental (or ‘national’) figure of debt today is well in excess of US$52.6Trillion – a figure of debt predominately created by all the industrialised nations (that have nuclear power stations and nuclear missiles).

And yet – even knowing that 10% of all species face extinction today and 33% of all species face extinction by the end of this century – and your own country is up to it’s ears in debt, you are STILL pushing forward with proposals – NOT for the support of the creation of ecologically beneficial (and ultimately peaceful) sustainable community living projects such as Eco-Villages – but with proposals for new nuclear war (heads).

Your proposals are themselves in direct conflict with the Geneva Convention, and also:

  1. Fukushima is still bleeding toxic nuclear waste (anyway)
  2. The proposals further contravene the ‘Human Right to Life’ (protected by Law)
  3. Contravene the Reap Report
  4. Contravene the Brundtland Report
  5. Contravene the Earth Charter
    1. Contravene Agenda 21 adopted after issue in Rio in 1992
    2. (And I repeat) – there is no money in your bank account

As there IS NO MONEY in your bank account – because you’ve already been forced to float the bankers out of bankruptcy – because the bankers didn’t have any money in ‘their’ bank account, (and you’ve already sold all the gold reserves), HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU POSSIBLY INVEST CIRCA £10BILLION IN NEW TRIDENT NUCLEAR MISSILES?

The effects of (this) total global economic collapse, were predicted in 2002, by Tony Smith MA, Architect & Lecturer at The College of West Anglia, King’s Lynn, (to students on the BTEC Higher National Certificate in Building Studies, i.e. me).

It was predicted that the bankers would create global economic collapse – because they were lending out far more money than they had.  (And also, if we weren’t careful, after governments around the world had floated their bankers out of bankruptcy, one of the next rounds of proposals may well lead us all into the next ‘world war 3’ – through the nuclear arms race – for ‘power’.)

When I was taught mathematics, (in Heacham Junior School in West Norfolk, and in Beaconsfield C of E Secondary School in Buckinghamshire), we were taught that if there are only four (organic, free-range) eggs in one basket, (whether the basket was hand-made using organic wicker grown ecologically by a craftsperson in the UK – or by a slave employed by a large multi-national conglomerate in a sweatshop in China, Taiwan, Korea, or Japan – or wherever) – it wasn’t possible to hand out, (trade, swap, or even to sell) seven eggs.

There IS only ONE Earth.

We ALL live on Earth – and we all have a right to Earth by Birth-Right.

According to the United Nations, by Spring 2011, global demand levels had reached 140%.

To repeat, there IS only ONE Earth – so how on Earth can you possibly balance your (Tax) accounts books?

You can’t sell seven eggs if there are only four – and you can’t sell 140% of 100% – and, as the whole wretched, dirty, double-dealing, disgusting banking system can’t even add up basic mathematics (due to their greed and corruption) – the whole world is, (as always), currently being forced to pay for it all?

Come on – wake up you lot ‘at the top’ – do your sums.

What are you all intended to do – kill us all with nuclear war, new nuclear Trident missiles, nuclear toxic dumping, nuclear waste, (and the continual bleeding of Fukushima) – plus of course, the nauseous & volatile ‘cocktail’ of petro-chemicals, GM, oil, petrol, diesel, LPG, Fracking, Acid Rain, AND the monotonous monopoly of monolithic mono-agricultural farming (on industrial proportions)?

Of course – we have a ‘Right To Life’ written in law – just the same as we ALL have a right to water written in and protected by ‘the law’ now too, (but realistically – how on Earth are we all supposed to take you all to court on account of your gross Professional Negligence, Murder, and Genocide – when we’re already dead, because you killed us ALL, by your own hands – through lack of access to clean drinking water, + new nuclear wars, nuclear holocaust, nuclear waste spills, oil spills, petrol spills, diesel spills, LPG spills, petro-chemical fertilisers, pesticides, and – to make even more profits, by feeding cows to cows)?

I beg you to take heed of these words – or be held accountable for your inaction.

As I am unable to proceed to take court proceedings against you when you have killed me, I will need to do so before you do – and in this, I have accumulated enough evidence in my lifetime already.

Please be aware that I first started to write (poetry) to raise awareness about the effects of pollution on the natural environment when I was about ten years old in the 1960s – so I have had plenty of years to observe, study, and research since then.

(Plus, I also represent one of the oldest living experts in this subject too – namely Avril Fox, author of ‘The Long Road To Realism’, ‘Testament of a Crone’, ‘The Emerging Ethic’, ‘Common Malaysian Moths’, and not forgetting of course – *GREEN DESIGN, which was co-written with her late son Robin Murrell.)

In fact, Avril and I are the co-designers and founders of non-profit organisations forming ‘Global Ark Projects’ (GAP – NGO) and the Tree Ark Project (TAP) intentional Eco-Village showcase ‘sustainable community living project’ social enterprises.

In (brief) summary:

Global Ark Projects (GAP) was formed to help people to join up together, to fill all the GAPs in the mARKet, to give somewhere a ‘hub’ that people could easily access to find what they needed in order to help them to save money (i.e. this recession) – through the use of all the most practical, sustainable and ecological (ethical) means and innovations, (only) – and which did NOT, (nor would not ever) promote the use of any unsustainable, un-ecological, or life-taking (killing) substances, (or methods).

(N.B.  Our proposals for ‘The Green Economy’ – aka ‘Green ECO-NO-MONEY’ – were invited for submission to MIT Climate CoLab in 2011, by Blindspotting James Greyson, Head of Blind Spot Think Tank, who, like me, is also a member of the Wiser {Earth} online community, as well as MIT Climate CoLab, Facebook, Twitter – and we’re also LinkedIn at LinkedIn too.)

Nowadays, there is NO excuse for ignorance – and, as we were taught on the BTEC HNC in Building Studies anyway, ‘Ignorance is NO Excuse in a Court of Law’ – ergo, if I am supposed to know it all as an (ecological) architectural designer, consultant, and technologist, you are too.

If I can get sued by my clients for (gross) Professional Negligence – IF I fail to fully satisfy the full brief of ‘The Earth Charter’, ‘The Egan Report’, ‘The Brundtland Report’, ’The Reap Report’, ‘Agenda 21’, (as well obviously as sustainability targets set by the United Nations – and even yourselves too – via the UK Planning Guidelines, UK Planning Law, the BRE, and all the Local Authority or ‘Council’ websites – stipulating the need for sustainability and ‘safety’ in all our proposals – either architecturally for individual applications – or indeed, for community applications), then so can you – ALL!

Any or ALL politicans, could be standing in ‘the dock’ in court – charged with being in full breach of their own rules.

Duplicity and double-dealing standards – and the lack of judicial accountability – are in part caused by your own break-down in your own rule-books, that have allowed and enforced ‘the general public’ to follow one set of rules – and provided you (all) with the feeling that you (yourselves), can walk free – regardless of your own crimes.

Crimes Sited:

  • The fraudulent miss-use and false claims of accountancy of expenses claims – paid for from the Tax Payers (i.e. ‘community’) Funds.
  • The proposals for Fracking sites – which contravene all guidelines for sustainability in all proposals
  • The proposals for new nuclear war – for proposals of new nuclear war-heads, missiles and new nuclear power stations (and generators)
  • The fraudulent duplicity of borrowing money against borrowed money (to cover the above – and the bankers own banking frauds)

As previously stated:

The effects of this recession were predicted in 2002 – so why did all the bankers continue to lend out up to 110% after this date?  (AND, why did all the Politicians allow them to do so?)

Ergo:

As ‘ALL the signs’ showed that this recession WAS about to hit us ALL, there clearly HAD to be a change in ALL the proposals formed – i.e. architecturally, the design for the economy is just the same as any other architectural design.  (And the architects of this ‘false’ economy are just as liable to be made accountable for their serious design faults as I am – IF the scales of justice [held by Lady Justice for thousands of years] are applicable to one and all the same and equally.)

There really isn’t any money.

Money is just a token promising to pay the bearer the gold value of the piece of paper that they hold in their hand – ergo, as all the gold reserves were already sold by Gordon Brown (and other politicians) previously – the pieces of paper that promise to pay the bearer are actually null and void.

In terms of proposals for new nuclear Trident war missiles therefore – and in terms of proposals for new nuclear submarines, new tanks, new jet fighter planes, new Duck Houses, new Kitchens, ‘moat cleaning’, (etc. etc.), what is to be used as the exchange currency rate in order to also purchase these articles of war (and toxic nuclear radiation pollutant/s)?

What is the overall costs in terms of all the factors – for all the factories, the nuclear power plants, the lorries, the fuel for the lorries, the staff, the premises, the waste disposal, and all the added securities and insurances needed for the manufacture of the proposed new nuclear Trident missiles?

(And what are the long-term consequences of these proposed actions? – Not within your ‘term of office’ – because within the four year window of your offices structure you aren’t going to see the long-term costs of your own actions, other than by balancing the books by producing [unnecessary] employment by your own proposals – so it just looks good on the books – but it isn’t.)

So the proposals for new Trident would provide lots of new jobs – IF the proposals were accepted – which they are most definitely NOT!

It would create new jobs in the manufacture of all the new nuclear war-heads and missiles, it would create new jobs in the production of all the new forms and documents that would need to be written (and re-written), it would undoubtedly also create new jobs in new nuclear power stations, and it would create new jobs in the staffing levels of all the (nuclear) armed forces, the guards needed for the new nuclear power plants, for the security – and also for the emergency services, etc.

But there IS NO MONEY!!

The world is currently circa US$52.6Trillion in debt already – the UK is currently circa US$2.5Trillion in debt already – so all you are liable to do, (apart from to kill us all by your proposals anyway), quite frankly, is to put us all even further into debt by all that you propose by way of new nuclear Trident missiles.

The financial costs of so doing are at least circa UK£10Billion – but THERE IS NO MONEY!!

So what are you going to do in order to create the funding needed in order to fulfil your proposals?  (Adding the costs to the UK Tax Payer’s costs – which are already paying for your salaries, your offices, your travelling expenses, your administrative staff, your stationary, your computers and equipment, your insurances, your holiday pay, your sickness pay, your pensions, your moats, duck houses, the national guard, and of course, bearing the full brunt of all of Her Majesties costs too – as well as the bankers.)

Come on – time’s up – it’s time for change.  (Councils such as Norfolk County Council already have ‘GAP’s of £189Million over the next three years!)

It doesn’t cost anything like even half this sum for us to build our own affordable eco-homes in our own intentional eco-village (type) carbon neutral ‘sustainable community living projects’.

AND – if we are all able to live in Eco-Villages in an Eco-Village existence, then we won’t (ever) need to make a claim of a single penny (more) of Tax Payers Funding, (because we’ll all be living 100% sustainably and ecologically).

Further – IF we all lived in peace in Eco-Villages – i.e. ‘Imagine Rural Development Initiative’ (IRDI) – then we’ll all be feeding our surplus (green) electricity and bio-gas into the mains too as a networked ‘green grid’, and that will save the world all the investment monies it doesn’t have in the first place.

EMAIL ‘TELEGRAM’ (POST): STOP ALL PROPOSALS FOR NEW TRIDENT MISSILES – STOP ALL PROPOSALS FOR ALL NEW NUCLEAR POWER – STOP ALL PROPOSALS FOR FRACKING – STOP ALL PROPOSALS FOR CLEANING MOATS – STOP ALL PROPOSALS FOR BUILDING NEW DUCK HOUSES – STOP.  (SOS), STOP!

…—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…  …—…

Yours Sincerely,

Linda Beamish

Eco/Ark-it-ectural Designer/Consultant/Technologist/Social Entrepreneur

Agent:  Representing Avil Fox (Co-Founders Ark Community)

Ambassador: Imagine Rural Development Initiative (IRDI)

Group Moderator:  UK Eco-Village Network (EVNUK)

Email: AnEarthMother@care2.com 

Mobile: (UK +44) 7425278960

*GREEN DESIGN, written by Avril Fox and Robin Murrell, first published in 1989 by Architecture Design and Technology Press London © Copyright Longman Group UK Limited 1989, ISBN: 1 85454 200 1 (N.B.  A CIP catalogue reference for this book is available through the British Library, for reference:  GREEN DESIGN is an essential A-Z reference book on the environmental sustainability of building materials.)

Websites:

Group Moderator at the UK Eco-Village Network – at www.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ecovillageuk/info

Ambassador: Imagine Rural Development Initiative (IRDI), Imagine Zambia, www.imaginezambia.org

www.Wiser.org/group/Ark

www.Wiser.org/group/ArkAngels

www.wiser.org/user/AnEarthMother

www.linkedin.com/pub/linda-beamish/13/987/889

www.anearthmother.wordpress.com

www.slideshare.net/AnEarthMother/presentations

www.youtube.com/user/AnEarthMother

www.facebook.com/AnEarthMother

www.twitter.com/AnEarthMother

www.twitter.com/TheArkDirectory

www.climatecolab.org/member/-/member/userId/166022

www.Eco-Designs.net

www.AnEarthMother.com

(A Friend of the Earth – aka ‘FoE’, ‘AnEarthMother’ and ‘AnArkAngel’ – for ALL children.)

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute.  Speak up and judge fairly: defend the rights of the poor and needy.”  Proverbs 31:8.9

The above quote is also re-quoted in ‘Voices Against Injustice’ (((VOICES))).  ISBN: 9 781845 502805. © Copyright 2007 Catherine House, Christian Focus Publications.

N.B.  The above was emailed to my local  MP (Keith Simpson), other local MPs, Family, Friends and Community – asking all to forward to MPs in Westminster, all to add to the campaign against yet more nuclear.

Image

Behind the picture postcard – barbarity.

Behind the picture postcard – barbarity..

This has to stop – we cannot be a ‘civilised’ species if we continue the slaughter of our companions here – pointless as it is, there is no justification for the barbaric neanderthals.

All my life I have imploded every single time I have seen these photographs and documentary footage – I have written, I have wept, I have cried a thousand times – WHY – dear God – WHY?

There is NO reason for this – if it’s done to preserve fish stocks, then I suggest that instead of the annual massacre of dolphins (and seals), that humans instead stop flushing chemicals down their toilets and out to sea – and they stop over-fishing, and filling the sea with nuclear toxicity too.

(Because if they don’t – there won’t be any more dolphins, there won’t be any more fish, there won’t be any more seals, there won’t be any more plankton, there won’t be any more turtles – or coral – and there won’t be any more children either because of it.)

We are part of an ecological system – dependent upon one another like bricks – and without the foundations of life – there cannot be any forms..